• Operation Q

The Adverse Effects of Experimental Messenger RNA (mRNA) "Vaccines" a.k.a. Injections For COVID-19

Updated: 3 days ago

The first and foremost point to be made here is that messenger RNA (mRNA) "vaccines" are not legally vaccines at all according to the CDC official definition. The FDA granted “emergency use authorization” for these vaccines (herein “mRNA injections”) because they are unlike conventional vaccines and is required by law to be granted only if there are no effective treatments for COVID-19 (which there are). The moment the "national emergency" that is COVID-19 is called off or an alternate treatment is deemed effective, all of the mRNA injections instantly become unapproved for human use.

Dr. David Martin leads a Zoom discussion between himself Dr. Judy Mikovits, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Dr. Rocco Galati in this excerpt from the January 5th, 2021 two-hour online event, “Focus on Fauci”, investigating the man who has been the Globalists’ point man in destroying millions of lives. Dr. David Martin's main point is that if we stipulate this mRNA injection is a vaccine we have already lost the battle.

The reason pharmaceutical companies have conditioned and propagandized society to perceive these experimental injections as vaccines is so they can award themselves the same liability immunity luxuries that are permitted to these companies for vaccines. While simultaneously this forces people to have a discussion about vaccines, when in realty this is a GMO like technology that injects an operating system into the human body designed to alter you by installing synthetic chemical pathogens that overwork the immune system.


Even fake news CNBC agrees that these liability immunities effectively prevent you from being able to sue in a U.S. court of law:

If you experience severe side effects after getting a Covid vaccine, lawyers tell CNBC there is basically no one to blame in a U.S. court of law.
The federal government has granted companies like Pfizer and Moderna immunity from liability if something unintentionally goes wrong with their vaccines.
“It is very rare for a blanket immunity law to be passed,” said Rogge Dunn, a Dallas labor and employment attorney. “Pharmaceutical companies typically aren’t offered much liability protection under the law.”
You also can’t sue the Food and Drug Administration for authorizing a vaccine for emergency use, nor can you hold your employer accountable if they mandate inoculation as a condition of employment.

According to the FDA “An investigational drug can also be called an experimental drug" and all mRNA vaccine candidates identify their new agents as “investigational.” Experimental categorization consists of the following reasons:

  • the pharmaceutical companies have applied for investigational use status

  • adverse events will be settled under the legal standard for experimental medications

  • recipients are enrolled as subjects in a medical trial to gather data on side effects.

  • persons are enrolled in a pharmaco-vigilance tracking system for at least two years

  • many groups of persons have not been studied at all, including: prior COVID-19 patients, pregnant women, youths, elderly

  • no published animal studies data


In the following two images we can see how Moderna and Pfizer both market their mRNA injections as an "operating system" and "software" as the Luciferian Fascist Jesuit Illuminati Freemasonic Cabal must put everything in plain sight to get "manufactured consent" from us to proceed with their eugenics, depopulation, and transhumanist-AI schemes. What we all need to realize is we are born with God given freedoms and rights, which we need to stop allowing globalist organizations and infiltrated governments make our decisions for us.

Moderna chief medical officer Tal Zaks even admits these mRNA injections alter human DNA in a sense of "hacking the software of life", listen to the segment of his TEDx Talk below.

Moderna is happily experimenting on humans with mRNA injections that they openly know alter our DNA and result in adverse effects all for their cabalistic agenda and monetary gain. In fact, Moderna had a 1383% revenue increase thanks to their mRNA injection profits of the 2020 fall quarter based on already signed agreements. Total revenue was $803 million for the year ending December 31, 2020 compared to only $60 million for the year ending December 31, 2019.

Let us take a moment to factor in the murky ethics surrounding health care institutions and workplaces compensating or pressuring employees into taking experimental mRNA injections which violate points 1, 4, 6, and 10 of the Nuremberg Code (1947) as seen below:

Furthermore, in relation to violating the Nuremberg Code (1947), The Corona Investigative Committee was established by four lawyers in Germany including: Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, Dr. Viviane Fischer, Justus Hoffmann and Antonia Fischer. Since July 10, 2020 they have been working with attorneys worldwide gathering testimonials for an international class-action lawsuit from a large number of international scientists and experts. The main highlighted points from their accumulated conclusions include:

  1. The corona crisis must be renamed the “Corona Scandal” for being the biggest tort case ever and the greatest crime against humanity ever committed

  2. Those responsible must be criminally prosecuted for crimes against humanity and sued for civil damages

Relatedly, lawyers Ruth Makhacholovsky and Aryeh Suchowolski have successfully brought forward a lawsuit to the International Criminal Court (The Hague, Netherlands). This lawsuit has been accepted and acknowledged by Mark Dillion (Head of Information & Evidence Unit) regarding crimes against humanity for the experimental mRNA COVID-19 injection testing pertaining to the multiple violations of the Nuremberg Code by the Israeli government unlawfully pressuring their citizens to get vaccinated or face discrimination.

Researchers from Sloan Kettering Cancer Center published a summary on August 27, 2018 stating that changes to mRNA essentially promote cancer. Up to December 3, 2020 that summary remained unchanged, however come January 13, 2021 the Sloan Kettering Institute found it critical to make an amendment specifying that these "previously unknown drivers of the disease" a.k.a. cancer have nothing to do with mRNA technology based injections developed against SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19).

Researchers at the Sloan Kettering Institute have found that changes in an information-carrying molecule called messenger RNA can inactivate tumor-suppressing proteins and thereby promote cancer. The findings pinpoint previously unknown drivers of the disease.

This brings our attention to the FDA and their Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee October 22, 2020 meeting presentation. In plain sight they list nearly two dozen "adverse event outcomes" from the time of publishing. Imagine if this experimental mRNA injection technology is actually studied properly with clinical trials how many additional negative adverse side effects will be uncovered with regards to mid and long term complications. Clinical trials are not set to finish until 2023, meaning all the indoctrinated sheep willingly and eagerly getting experimental mRNA injections are a live walking contagious experiment.

Speaking of sheep and trials relating to mRNA COVID-19 injections, Colleen Huber, NMD, released a report titled "COVID-19 Vaccine Considerations" on February 21, 2021 that highlighted:

This technology has been tried on animals, and in the animal studies done, all the animals died, not immediately from the injection, but months later, from other immune disorders, sepsis and/or cardiac failure. There has never been a long-term successful animal study using this technology. No experimental coronavirus vaccine has succeeded in animal studies.

Moreover, we have an evidence review from the Penn Medicine Center for evidence-based practice which openly concludes "the rate of severe adverse effects (severe enough to interfere with a person’s daily activities) appears to be in the range of 5 to 10 percent. The rate and severity of adverse events increases with vaccine dose. The rate and severity of adverse events also appears to be greater following a second dose of vaccine than following the first."

Does anything sound wrong to you about pushing mRNA injections where 5-10% of clinical trials result in adverse effects? Where rate and severity of adverse events increases with further dosages... All for the alleged "disease" coronavirus (common cold) with a 99.9% survival rate for people 69 and under.

These adverse effects have already been heavily reported across the world, commonly as severe allergic reactions such as in Dr. Hossein Sadrzadeh case back in December 2020. Increasingly, reports are also surfacing worldwide of people dying after their second dosage of the mRNA injection, almost as if it is the kill switch to go along with the first dosage. The following are examples of people falling ill or dying after receiving either the first or second dosage of either the Moderna or Pfizer mRNA COVID-19 operating system injection:

These adverse effects and sudden deaths after dosages are no surprise as Dr. Sherri Tenpenny (known as the most knowledgeable and outspoken physician on the adverse impact that vaccines can have on health) already warned the world that the COVID vaccines’ depopulation effects will start in 3 to 6 months from point of injection. Reinette Senum interviews Dr. Tenpenny in the following video where she describes the "religion of vaccination indoctrination" as vaccines now and always have been "a method of mass destruction, a method of depopulation, and a method of creating customers for life."

Equivalently, Dr. Lee Merritt of America’s Frontline Doctors shares a similar opinion to Dr. Tenpenny in her interview with The Sons of Liberty where she explains experimental operating system Injections are going to result in a lot of deaths. Take a look at the following interview.

On another note, an angelic anonymous naturopathic doctor under the alias Herbal Sage Queen has conducted a commentary review on Baden, L.R. et al.'s "Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine" (Dec 2020 - NEJM DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035389) as follows:

The trial enrolled 30,420 volunteers who were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either vaccine or placebo (15,210 participants in each group).
The primary end point was prevention of Covid-19 illness [not infection] with onset at least 14 days after the second injection in participants who had not previously been infected with SARS-CoV-2.
The mRNA-1273 vaccine showed 94.1% efficacy at preventing Covid-19 illness [NOT infection], including severe disease.
Covid-19 cases were defined as occurring in participants who had at least two of the following symptoms: fever (temperature ≥38°C), chills, myalgia, headache, sore throat, or new olfactory or taste disorder, or as occurring in those who had at least one respiratory sign or symptom (including cough, shortness of breath, or clinical or radiographic evidence of pneumonia) and at least one nasopharyngeal swab, nasal swab, or saliva sample (or respiratory sample, if the participant was hospitalized) that was positive for SARS-CoV-2 by reverse-transcriptase–polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) test.

This definition of COVID-19 excludes asymptomatic cases, including those who tested positive for COVID-19, which is a large amount of positive cases. This study design also excludes the question for whether or not the vaccine has any preventative properties.

Participants were assessed for the presence of SARS-CoV-2–binding antibodies specific to the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (Roche Elecsys, Roche Diagnostics International) and had a nasopharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2RT-PCR testing (Viracor, Eurofins Clinical Diagnostics) before each injection.
Common reasons for not receiving the second dose were withdrawal of consent (153 participants) and the detection of SARS-CoV-2 by PCR before the administration of the second dose on day 29 (114 participants: 69 in the placebo group and 45 in the mRNA- 1273 group).

This shows that those who designed this study had the ability to test for COVID-19, but they did not use it to see if the “vaccine” had any preventative effects. Not only would giving everyone a COVID-19 test to participants on a weekly basis until the end of the study give information on whether or not it has preventative properties, but it could possibly give data confirming (or not) the overtly flawed PCR tests.


Their made-up definition of COVID-19 for this study and their lack of more testing throughout the study to test its preventative effects seem very deliberate. Dr. Fauci himself when commenting on this study agreed that it shows no evidence for the vaccine’s preventative effects. Meanwhile, many “experts” are going on the news and stating the opposite: that it can provide herd immunity and protect others.


The results of this study showed 95% efficacy with 85% efficacy for those 65 years of age and older, but does not report any significance on its ability to contribute to herd immunity or prevention. The fact that they had the ability to test this and did not is a major ethical red flag! This is important because the opposite message is being spread across the fake news and the internet.


Watch out for low quality evidence on the “vaccines” saying something along the lines of it being able to decrease infection and transmission rates because so far the evidence is lacking. This poorly designed study shows that it may protect those who get the vaccines but says nothing about it protecting others, which has been the narrative ingrained in the mainstream programming machines. Also, if there’s no evidence claiming that this injection can be preventative from spreading, how is it possible that it has the power to stop new variants of COVID-19? They are rushing this vaccine out with little data. We should all be questioning further.


Another major discrepancy in this study is ignoring dependent/independent variables. In this case, the most important independent variable is who got vaccinated and who got exposed to the virus. Therefore, it is not clear if the injection is what decreased the risk of COVID-19 or if it was just that those participants were not exposed to it at all. Although the number of participants were high (30,000), it cannot be assumed that the treatment group and control group had the exact same risk of exposure. They should have created at least one or two independent variables to strengthen the evidence in this study. Perhaps they did do that and it significantly changed the results, therefore they excluded it from publication. Either way, this is extremely shady “science.”


Although the initial study population was high (30,000), the end population was 196 due to the small number of cases who fit into their made-up definition of positive COVID-19 cases. Maybe that’s why they made up their own definition…


They say to trust the science, but when proper scientific methodology and lack of ethics are not in place, that is not science. They are misusing the word and taking advantage of whole populations’ lack of training in the scientific method.


According to CDC statistics and accounting for their report of only approximately 14% of cases are being reported, the US alone is already reaching herd immunity before widespread vaccine use and the case numbers are already decreasing.


Why get the vaccine? To help and protect others? Well, no. There is no evidence of this. To prevent infection? No, you’ll still get infected and spread it.


Currently there is a complete lack of high quality scientific literature reporting the severe and deathly adverse effects from this injection and this study also chooses to ignore what is being shared and seen in the public eye: deathly allergic reactions. That’s only considering acute reactions. We don’t even know what health issues this can bring long-term, but from what we know about mRNA, it could be anything from neurological disorders, autoimmune illness, cancer and infertility or all of the above. Why are they pressuring children (lowest risk population) to get the vaccine? It is unethical and unscientific. Population control at it’s finest.


Keep your eyes open. They are going to give all of the credit to the vaccine and not the natural herd immunity that is occurring already before widespread vaccine use. They are clearly pushing a poisonous narrative for humanity.

It's also rather disturbing that upon some patent searching I easily uncovered numerous virus patents owned by several globalist and governmental "health" organizations.

There is even one for the coronavirus itself held by the Pirbright Institute where its opening abstract states "The coronavirus may be used as a vaccine for treating and/or preventing a disease, such as infectious bronchitis, in a subject." Does this not raise your eyebrows? Why was this patent application put forward in 2014? Were they planning the COVID-19 plandemic since then? Likely, before then. How can the coronavirus (the common cold) be used as a vaccine to treat or prevent diseases? Something clearly is not adding up just like the entire scamdemic itself.

Now take a moment and think to yourself, does this entire operating system / software injection not sound like the gateway to the LGBTQP-Transhumanist-AI-NWO agenda? Does this not sound awfully biblical as in regards to the mark of the beast? Where humans become merged with AI and biotechnology forcibly connecting them to an AI-singularity effectively blocking humankinds connection to the Christ consciousness?

Supporting Videos


Supporting Sources

Bonus

HMM NEWS

WE ARE THE NEWS NOW

NEWS THAT MAKES YOU SAY HMM...

FINALLY A NEWS SOURCE YOU CAN TRUST

DELIVERING RAW, UNADULTERATED TRUTH IN NEWS REPORTING

Connect & Please Share Operation Q's (HMM's Managing Editor)

RedPilling Articles On All Platforms

⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️

https://link-tube.com/OperationQ

⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️

The choice is yours to know. God Bless & WWG1WGA!

Follow The Humorous Mathematicians:


Facebook

Parler

Reddit

Twitch

YouTube


Do you have a story you’d like us to cover, information the world needs to hear, or would you like to become a contributor to HMM News? Visit our contact page, email us, or text us @ 202-735-1711 and let us know.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are that of the author and may not represent the official views of HMM News or the Humorous Mathematics Media Network. Stories filed under Opinion contain information from various sources that may be both, verified and unverified. HMM News and the Humorous Mathematics Media Network do not make any claims as to the validity of the information expressed in the opinion section, however we do encourage the reader to do further research on their own and we hope that you will share your findings with us. The mission for the truth requires a collective effort.

14,360 views0 comments

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

  • White Facebook Icon

© 2021 Humorous Mathematics Media

info@humorousmathematicians.com

+1 202.735.1711